Mercury emissions:
In
March 2005, nine states (California, New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, New Mexico and Vermont) sued the EPA. The
EPA's inspector general had determined that the EPA's regulation of mercury emissions did not follow the Clean Air Act, and
that the regulations were influenced by top political appointees. The EPA had
suppressed a study it commissioned by Harvard University which contradicted its position on mercury controls.
The suit alleges that the EPA's rule allowing exemption from "maximum
available control technology" was illegal, and additionally charged that
the EPA's system of pollution credit trading allows power plants to forego
reducing mercury emissions. Several states also began to enact their own
mercury emission regulations. Illinois's proposed rule would have reduced
mercury emissions from power plants by an average of 90% by 2009M
No comments:
Post a Comment